UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-33988
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
26-0405422 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
identification no.) |
|
|
|
814 Livingston Court |
|
|
Marietta, Georgia
|
|
30067 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(770) 644-3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of July 22, 2011, there were 389,245,688 shares of the registrants Common Stock, par value
$0.01 per share, outstanding.
Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements regarding the expectations of Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPHC and,
together with its subsidiaries, the Company), including, but not limited to, statements regarding
cost savings from its continuous improvement programs, capital investment, depreciation and
amortization, interest expense, net debt reduction, the availability of net operating losses to offset future taxable income, pension plan contributions and postretirement
health care benefit payments, in this report constitute forward-looking statements as defined in
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based on currently
available operating, financial and competitive information and are subject to various risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Companys historical
experience and its present expectations. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited
to, the Companys substantial amount of debt, inflation of and volatility in raw material and
energy costs, continuing pressure for lower cost products, the Companys ability to implement its
business strategies, including productivity initiatives and cost reduction plans, currency
movements and other risks of conducting business internationally, and the impact of regulatory and
litigation matters, including those that could impact the Companys ability to protect
and use its intellectual property. Undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking
statements, as such statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and the Company
undertakes no obligation to update such statements. Additional information regarding these and
other risks is contained in Part I, Item 1A., Risk Factors of the Companys 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K and in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
In millions, except per share amounts |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
1,080.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,036.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,081.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,040.6 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
915.3 |
|
|
|
887.7 |
|
|
|
1,757.7 |
|
|
|
1,746.0 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative |
|
|
90.4 |
|
|
|
78.4 |
|
|
|
179.9 |
|
|
|
155.8 |
|
Other (Income) Expense, Net |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
Restructuring and Other Special Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
Income from Operations |
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
144.9 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
(36.6 |
) |
|
|
(45.0 |
) |
|
|
(75.9 |
) |
|
|
(90.0 |
) |
Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes and Equity Income of
Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
|
|
68.2 |
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
Income (Loss) before Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
(32.8 |
) |
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
Income (Loss) Per Share Basic |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Income (Loss) Per Share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding Basic |
|
|
378.9 |
|
|
|
343.7 |
|
|
|
361.6 |
|
|
|
343.5 |
|
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding Diluted |
|
|
384.5 |
|
|
|
343.7 |
|
|
|
367.1 |
|
|
|
343.5 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
In millions, except share and per share amounts |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
191.2 |
|
|
$ |
138.7 |
|
Receivables, Net |
|
|
441.7 |
|
|
|
382.2 |
|
Inventories, Net |
|
|
490.9 |
|
|
|
417.3 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
|
75.4 |
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
1,195.5 |
|
|
|
1,013.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
|
|
1,635.6 |
|
|
|
1,641.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,221.1 |
|
|
|
1,205.2 |
|
Intangible Assets, Net |
|
|
558.1 |
|
|
|
576.6 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,657.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,484.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Debt and Current Portion of Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
19.7 |
|
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
393.6 |
|
|
|
361.5 |
|
Interest Payable |
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
Other Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
189.3 |
|
|
|
179.8 |
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
627.3 |
|
|
|
595.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
2,418.1 |
|
|
|
2,553.1 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities |
|
|
250.5 |
|
|
|
241.1 |
|
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
|
311.2 |
|
|
|
347.7 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
3,607.1 |
|
|
|
3,737.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share; 100,000,000
shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share; 1,000,000,000
shares authorized; 389,245,688 and 343,698,778 shares
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
2,176.0 |
|
|
|
1,965.2 |
|
Accumulated Deficit |
|
|
(949.5 |
) |
|
|
(1,008.3 |
) |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
(180.5 |
) |
|
|
(213.3 |
) |
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,049.9 |
|
|
|
747.0 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
4,657.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,484.6 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
Non-cash Items Included in Net Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
139.4 |
|
|
|
147.6 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Amount of Postretirement Expense Less Than Funding |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
Other, Net |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
(94.0 |
) |
|
|
(65.2 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
117.6 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Spending |
|
|
(70.8 |
) |
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
Acquisition of Business |
|
|
(51.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(124.5 |
) |
|
|
(37.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
238.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of Common Stock |
|
|
(32.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments on Debt |
|
|
(150.0 |
) |
|
|
(34.9 |
) |
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facilities |
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
110.4 |
|
Payments on Revolving Credit Facilities |
|
|
(55.8 |
) |
|
|
(110.4 |
) |
Redemption and Early Tender Premiums and Debt Issuance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Other, Net |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
138.7 |
|
|
|
149.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
191.2 |
|
|
$ |
171.6 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 GENERAL INFORMATION
Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation
Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPHC and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company) is a
leading provider of packaging solutions for a wide variety of products to food, beverage and other
consumer products companies. The Company is the largest U.S. producer of folding cartons and holds
a leading market position in coated unbleached kraft paperboard, coated-recycled boxboard and
flexible packaging. The Companys customers include some of the most widely recognized companies in
the world. The Company strives to provide its customers with packaging solutions designed to
deliver marketing and performance benefits at a competitive cost by capitalizing on its low-cost
paperboard mills and converting plants, its proprietary carton and packaging designs, and its
commitment to customer service.
GPHC and Graphic Packaging Corporation (GPC) conduct no significant business and have no
independent assets or operations other than GPHCs ownership of all of GPCs outstanding common
stock, and GPCs ownership of all of Graphic Packaging International, Inc.s (GPII) outstanding
common stock.
The Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include all subsidiaries in which the
Company has the ability to exercise direct or indirect control over operating and financial
policies. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
In the Companys opinion, the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain all
normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The Companys year end Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet data was derived from audited financial statements. The accompanying unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with instructions to
Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and do not include all the information required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for complete
financial statements. Therefore, these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read
in conjunction with GPHCs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. In
addition, the preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates and changes in these
statements are recorded as known.
For a summary of the Companys significant accounting policies, please refer to GPHCs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Equity Offering
On April 20, 2011, the Company completed a 47.0 million share
public offering of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share, priced at $4.75 per share, resulting in net proceeds of $213.2 million after deducting offering expenses. The Company used
$29.5 million of the net proceeds from the offering to repurchase and subsequently retire 6.5
million shares of common stock held by the Grover C. Coors Trust (Coors Trust). In addition,
the Company granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 7.05
million shares to cover over-allotments, if any. At the end of the 30-day option period, on May
18, 2011, the Company issued an additional 5.5 million shares of its common stock at $4.75 per
share and received net proceeds of
$25.1 million after deducting offering expenses. The Company used $3.4 million of net proceeds
to repurchase and subsequently retire an additional 764,922 shares of the common stock held by the
Coors Trust.
On April 29, 2011, the Company used $51.9 million of the proceeds from the offering to acquire
substantially all of the assets of Sierra Pacific Packaging, Inc., (Sierra) a producer of folding cartons,
beverage carriers and corrugated boxes for the consumer packaged goods industry. The purchase
price has been preliminarily allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on
estimated fair
7
values as of the purchase date. The excess of the total purchase consideration over
the aggregate fair value of identifiable net assets of
$14.5 million was allocated to goodwill and the Company expects to deduct approximately $24 million of goodwill
for tax purposes. The acquisition will be included in the paperboard packaging segment.
The Company used the remaining net proceeds to reduce its indebtedness and for general corporate
purposes.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted revised guidance as required by the Revenue
Recognition topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (the FASB Codification) which requires vendors to account for transactions with the
same customer involving multiple products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a
combined unit. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance amending the Other Comprehensive Income topic of the FASB
Codification. The guidance provides an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive
income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a
single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.
This guidance will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2012 and is not expected to
have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance amending the Fair Value Measurement topic of the FASB
Codification. This amendment represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the International
Accounting Standard Board on fair value measurement, resulting in common requirements for measuring
fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. This guidance will be
effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2012 to be applied prospectively and is not
expected to have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
NOTE 2 INVENTORIES, NET
Inventories, Net by major class:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Finished Goods |
|
$ |
260.6 |
|
|
$ |
229.3 |
|
Work in Progress |
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
Raw Materials |
|
|
133.4 |
|
|
|
100.9 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
490.9 |
|
|
$ |
417.3 |
|
|
8
NOTE 3 DEBT
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company used a portion of its proceeds from the
equity offering to prepay $150.0 million of its term loans. In July 2011, the Company called the
remaining $73.3 million of its Senior Subordinated Notes due
2013 for settlement on August 15,
2011. For more information regarding the characteristics of the Companys debt, see Note 6
Debt of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Long-Term Debt is composed of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Senior Notes with interest payable semi-annually at 7.875%, payable in 2018
($250.0 million face amount) |
|
$ |
246.2 |
|
|
$ |
246.0 |
|
Senior Notes with interest payable semi-annually at 9.5%, payable in 2017 ($425.0
million face amount) |
|
|
423.3 |
|
|
|
423.5 |
|
Senior Subordinated Notes with interest payable semi-annually at 9.5%, payable in 2013 |
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
73.3 |
|
Senior Secured Term Loan Facility with interest payable at various dates at floating
rates (2.29% at June 30, 2011) payable through 2014 |
|
|
769.0 |
|
|
|
837.7 |
|
Senior Secured Term Loan Facility with interest payable at various dates at floating
rates (3.04% at June 30, 2011) payable through 2014 |
|
|
908.6 |
|
|
|
989.9 |
|
Senior Secured Revolving Facility with interest payable at various dates at floating
rates (2.22% at June 30, 2011) payable in 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,429.5 |
|
|
|
2,572.4 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,418.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,553.1 |
|
|
At June 30, 2011, the Company and its U.S. and international subsidiaries had the following
commitments, amounts outstanding and amounts available under revolving credit facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Total |
In millions |
|
Commitments |
|
Outstanding |
|
Available(a) |
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
|
$ |
400.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
363.6 |
|
International Facilities |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
413.1 |
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
368.4 |
|
|
Note:
(a) |
|
In accordance with its debt agreements, the Companys availability under its Revolving Credit
Facility has been reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit issued of $36.4 million
as of June 30, 2011. These letters of credit are used primarily as security against its
self-insurance obligations and workers compensation obligations. These letters of credit
expire at various dates through 2012 unless extended. |
The Credit Agreement and the indentures governing the 9.5% Senior Notes due 2017, the 9.5% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013, and the 7.875% Senior Notes due 2018 (the Indentures) limit the
Companys ability to incur additional indebtedness. Additional covenants contained in the Credit
Agreement and the Indentures, among other things, restrict the ability of the Company to dispose of
assets, incur guarantee obligations, prepay other indebtedness, make dividend and other restricted
payments, create liens, make equity or debt investments, make acquisitions, modify terms of the
Indentures, engage in mergers or consolidations, change the business conducted by the Company and
its subsidiaries, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates. Such restrictions, together
with the highly leveraged nature of the Company, could limit the Companys ability to respond to
changing market conditions, fund its capital spending program, provide for unexpected capital
investments or take advantage of business opportunities. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in
compliance with the covenants in the Credit Agreement and the Indentures.
9
NOTE 4 STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
The Company has five equity compensation plans, but since 2004 the Companys only plan pursuant to
which new grants are made is the Graphic Packaging Holding Company Amended and Restated 2004 Stock
and Incentive Compensation plan (previously named the Graphic Packaging Corporation 2004 Stock and
Incentive Compensation Plan) (the 2004 Plan). Stock options and other awards granted under all of
the Companys plans generally vest and expire in accordance with terms established at the time of
grant. Shares issued pursuant to awards under the plans are from the Companys authorized but
unissued shares. Compensation costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period of the award.
Stock Awards, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
The Companys 2004 Plan permits the grant
of stock awards, restricted stock and restricted stock units (RSUs). All RSUs vest
and become payable in one to five years from date of grant. Upon vesting, RSUs are payable in cash
and shares of common stock, based on the proportion set forth in the grant agreements.
Data concerning RSUs and stock awards granted in the first six months of 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
Shares in thousands |
|
Shares |
|
Value Per Share |
|
RSUs Employees |
|
|
3,946 |
|
|
$ |
5.17 |
|
Stock Awards Board of Directors |
|
|
199 |
|
|
$ |
5.43 |
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, $13.8 million and $4.5 million, respectively,
were charged to compensation expense for stock incentive plans.
NOTE 5 PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company maintains both defined benefit pension plans and postretirement health care plans that
provide medical and life insurance coverage to eligible salaried and hourly retired employees in
North America and their dependents. The Company maintains international defined benefit pension
plans which are both noncontributory and contributory and are funded in accordance with applicable
local laws. Pension or termination benefits are based primarily on years of service and the
employees compensation.
Currently, the North American defined benefit plans are closed to newly-hired salaried and
non-union hourly employees. Effective July 1, 2011, the North American defined benefit plans were
frozen for most salaried and non-union hourly employees and replaced with a defined contribution
plan. The impact of the freeze recorded in the second quarter of 2011 was a curtailment gain of
$0.8 million and a reduction in the liability of $7.8 million, resulting in a net decrease of $7.0
million in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.
The U.K. defined benefit plan was frozen effective March 31, 2001 and replaced with a defined
contribution plan.
10
Pension and Postretirement Expense
The pension and postretirement expenses related to the Companys plans consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement Health |
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Care Benefits |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Components of Net
Periodic Cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Cost |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Admin Expenses |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Return on
Plan Assets |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
(29.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment Gain |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Service Cost |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Actuarial Loss
(Gain) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
Net Periodic Cost |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
12.6 |
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
Employer Contributions
The Company made contributions of $23.3 million and $18.7 million to its pension plans during the
first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company expects to make contributions of $50
million to $70 million for the full year 2011. During 2010, the Company made $47.3 million of
contributions to its pension plans.
The Company made postretirement health care benefit payments of $0.8 million and $0.9 million
during the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company estimates its
postretirement health care benefit payments for the full year 2011 to be approximately $4 million.
During 2010, the Company made postretirement health care benefit payments of $3.2 million.
NOTE 6 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The Company enters into derivative instruments for risk management purposes only, including
derivatives designated as hedging instruments under the Derivatives and Hedging topic of the FASB
Codification and those not designated as hedging instruments under this guidance. The Company uses
interest rate swaps, natural gas swap contracts, and forward exchange contracts. These derivative
instruments are designated as cash flow hedges and, to the extent they are effective in offsetting
the variability of the hedged cash flows, changes in the derivatives fair value are not included
in current earnings but are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. These changes in fair
value will subsequently be reclassified to earnings.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risks on future interest payments
caused by interest rate changes on its variable rate term loan facility. The differential to be
paid or received under these agreements is recognized as an adjustment to Interest Expense related
to debt. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had interest rate swap agreements with
a notional amount of $920 million and $1,250 million, respectively. The outstanding swap
agreements under which the Company will pay fixed rates of 2.24% to
3.84% and receive three-month LIBOR rates, expire on various dates in 2012.
Changes in fair value will subsequently be reclassified into earnings as a component of Interest
Expense, Net as interest is incurred on amounts outstanding under the term loan facility.
Ineffectiveness measured in the hedging relationship is recorded in earnings in the period it
occurs.
During the first six months of 2011 and 2010, there were no amounts or minimal amounts of
ineffectiveness related to changes in the fair value of interest rate swap agreements.
Additionally, there were no amounts excluded from the measure of effectiveness.
11
Commodity Risk
To manage risks associated with future variability in cash flows and price risk attributable to
certain commodity purchases, the Company enters into natural gas swap contracts to hedge prices for
a designated percentage of its expected natural gas usage. The Company has entered into natural gas
swap contracts to hedge pricing for approximately 56% of its expected natural gas usage for the
remainder of 2011 with a weighted average contractual rate of $4.73 per one million British Thermal
Unit (MMBTU), and for 40% of its expected natural gas usage for the first quarter of 2012 with a weighted
average contractual price of $4.84 per MMBTU. Such contracts are
designated as cash flow hedges. The contracts are carried at fair value with changes in fair value
recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), and the resulting gain or loss is
reclassified into Cost of Sales concurrently with the recognition of the commodity consumed. The
ineffective portion of the swap contracts change in fair value would be recognized immediately in
earnings.
During the first six months of 2011 and 2010, there were minimal amounts of ineffectiveness related
to changes in the fair value of natural gas swap contracts. Additionally, there were no amounts
excluded from the measure of effectiveness.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company enters into forward exchange contracts to manage risks associated with future
variability in cash flows resulting from anticipated foreign currency transactions that may be
adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. Such contracts are designated as cash flow hedges.
The contracts are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss), and gains/losses related to these contracts are recognized in Other
(Income) Expense, Net when the anticipated transaction affects income. At June 30, 2011, multiple
forward exchange contracts existed that expire on various dates through 2012. Those purchased
forward exchange contracts outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, when aggregated and
measured in U.S. dollars at contractual rates at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively,
had notional amounts totaling $38.8 million and $58.7 million.
No amounts were reclassified to earnings during the first six months of 2011 or during 2010 in
connection with forecasted transactions that were no longer considered probable of occurring, and
there was no amount of ineffectiveness related to changes in the fair value of foreign currency
forward contracts. Additionally, there were no amounts excluded from the measure of effectiveness.
Derivatives not Designated as Hedges
The Company enters into forward exchange contracts to effectively hedge substantially all of
accounts receivable resulting from transactions denominated in foreign currencies in order to
manage risks associated with foreign currency transactions adversely affected by changes in
exchange rates. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, multiple foreign currency forward exchange
contracts existed, with maturities ranging up to three months. Those foreign currency exchange
contracts outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, when aggregated and measured in U.S.
dollars at exchange rates at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, had net notional
amounts totaling $19.6 million and $8.2 million. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from these
contracts are recognized in Other (Income) Expense, Net and approximately offset corresponding
recognized but unrealized gains and losses on these accounts receivable.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys derivative instruments are carried at fair value. The Company has determined that the
inputs to the valuation of these derivative instruments are level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Level 2 inputs are defined as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or
inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market
corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. The Company uses
valuation techniques based on discounted cash flow analyses, which reflects the terms of the
derivatives and uses observable market-based inputs, including forward rates and uses market price
quotations obtained from independent derivatives brokers, corroborated with information obtained
from independent pricing service providers.
As of June 30, 2011, there has not been any significant impact to the fair value of the Companys
derivative liabilities due to its own credit risk. Similarly, there has not been any significant
adverse impact to the Companys derivative assets based on evaluation of the Companys
counterparties credit risks.
12
The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
Derivative |
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
In millions |
|
Location |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Location |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Derivative Contracts Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Contracts |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
Other Accrued Liabilities |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
Foreign Currency Contracts |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Other Accrued Liabilities and Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Interest Rate Swap Agreements |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Accrued Liabilities and Interest Payable |
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
Derivative Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Contracts |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
Total Derivative Contracts |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
$ |
35.0 |
|
|
The fair values of the Companys other financial assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 approximately equal the carrying values reported on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets except for Long-Term Debt. The fair value of the Companys Long-Term Debt was $2,487.0
million and $2,626.8 million as compared to the carrying amounts of $2,429.5 million and $2,572.4
million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The fair value of Long-Term Debt
is based on quoted market prices.
Effect of Derivative Instruments
The effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss (Gain) |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss (Gain) |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of (Gain) |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Statement of |
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
Location |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Location |
|
(Ineffective Portion) |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
in Statement of |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
in Statement of |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operations |
|
June 30, |
|
Operations |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Portion) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Portion) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Commodity Contracts |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
Cost of Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
Foreign Currency Contracts |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
Other (Income)
Expense, Net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
Other (Income)
Expense, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Agreements |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
Interest Expense,
Net |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
Interest Expense,
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss (Gain) |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss (Gain) |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Statement of |
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
Location |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Location |
|
(Ineffective Portion) |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
in Statement of |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
in Statement of |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operations |
|
June 30, |
|
Operations |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Portion) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Portion) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Commodity Contracts |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
Cost of Sales |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
Cost of Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Foreign Currency Contracts |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
Other Expense, Net |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
Other Expense, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Agreements |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
In millions |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Foreign Currency Contracts |
|
Other (Income) Expense, Net |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
Accumulated Derivative Instruments (Loss) Gain
The following is a rollforward of Accumulated Derivative Instruments (Loss) Gain which is included
in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(27.4 |
) |
Reclassification to earnings |
|
|
15.7 |
|
Current period change in fair value |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
(16.9 |
) |
|
At June 30, 2011, the Company expects to reclassify approximately $16.9 million of losses in the
next twelve months from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss to earnings, contemporaneously with
and offsetting changes in the related hedged exposure. The actual amount that will be reclassified
to future earnings may vary from this amount as a result of changes in market conditions.
NOTE 7 INCOME TAXES
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized Income Tax Expense of
$7.4 million and $10.3 million on Income before Income Taxes and Equity Income of Unconsolidated
Entities of $38.9 million and $68.2 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, the Company recognized Income Tax Expense of $10.2 million and $18.8 million on a
Loss before Income Taxes and Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities of $23.1 million and $8.5
million. Income Tax Expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
primarily relates to the non-cash expense of $5.6 million and $11.2 million, and $8.0 million and
$15.9, respectively, associated with the amortization of goodwill for tax purposes. The reduction
was primarily due to a portion of goodwill being fully amortized at the end of 2010. During the
first quarter of 2011, the Company also recorded a benefit related to certain discrete events
including the revision of state tax positions and the expiration of the statute of limitation
associated with reserves in a foreign jurisdiction. The Company has approximately $1.2 billion of
NOLs for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which is currently being used and may be used to offset future taxable income.
14
NOTE 8 COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following table shows the components of Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
(32.8 |
) |
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Income (Loss) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Pension Benefit Plans |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Postretirement Benefit Plans |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Postemployment Benefit Plans |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
49.1 |
|
|
$ |
(30.7 |
) |
|
$ |
91.6 |
|
|
$ |
(30.5 |
) |
|
NOTE 9 ENVIRONMENTAL AND LEGAL MATTERS
Environmental Matters
The Company is subject to a broad range of foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health
and safety laws and regulations, including those governing discharges to air, soil and water, the
management, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances, solid waste and hazardous wastes, the
investigation and remediation of contamination resulting from historical site operations and
releases of hazardous substances, and the health and safety of employees. Compliance initiatives
could result in significant costs, which could negatively impact the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Any failure to comply with environmental
or health and safety laws and regulations or any permits and authorizations required thereunder
could subject the Company to fines, corrective action or other sanctions.
Some of the Companys current and former facilities are the subject of environmental investigations
and remediations resulting from historical operations and the release of hazardous substances or
other constituents. Some current and former facilities have a history of industrial usage for which
investigation and remediation obligations may be imposed in the future or for which indemnification
claims may be asserted against the Company. Also, potential future closures or sales of facilities
may necessitate further investigation and may result in future remediation at those facilities.
On October 8, 2007, the Company received a notice from the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (the EPA) indicating that it is a potentially responsible party for the remedial
investigation and feasibility study to be conducted at the Devils Swamp Lake site in East Baton
Rouge Parish, Louisiana. The Company believes it is a de minimis contributor to the site and
expects to enter into negotiations with the EPA and other potentially responsible parties regarding
its potential responsibility and liability. There have been no material developments in this
action since the Company received the original notice in October 2007.
The Company has established reserves for those facilities or issues where liability is probable and
the costs are reasonably estimable. The Company believes that the amounts accrued for all of its
loss contingencies, and the reasonably possible loss beyond the amounts accrued, are not material
to the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company
cannot estimate with certainty other future corrective compliance, investigation or remediation
costs. Costs relating to historical usage that the Company considers to be reasonably possible of
resulting in liability are not quantifiable at this time. The Company will continue to monitor
environmental issues at each of its facilities, as well as regulatory developments, and will revise
its accruals, estimates and disclosures relating to past, present and future operations, as
additional information is obtained.
Legal Matters
The Company is a party to a number of lawsuits arising in the ordinary conduct of its business.
Although the timing and outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company
does not believe that disposition of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
15
NOTE 10 BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company reports its results in two business segments: paperboard packaging and flexible
packaging. These segments are evaluated by the chief operating decision maker based primarily on
Income from Operations. The Companys reportable segments are based upon strategic business units
that offer different products. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as
those described in GPHCs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The paperboard packaging segment is highly integrated and includes a system of mills and plants
that produces a broad range of paperboard grades convertible into folding cartons. Folding cartons
are used primarily to protect products, such as food, detergents, paper products, beverages, and
health and beauty aids, while providing point of purchase advertising. The paperboard packaging
business segment includes the design, manufacture and installation of packaging machinery related
to the assembly of cartons and the production and sale of corrugated medium and kraft paper from
paperboard mills in the U.S.
The flexible packaging segment converts kraft and specialty paper into multi-wall bags, consumer
and specialty retail bags and produces flexible packaging, label solutions and laminations. The
multi-wall bags are designed to ship and protect a wide range of industrial and consumer products including
fertilizers, chemicals, concrete and pet and food products. The flexible packaging, label solutions
and laminations are converted from a wide variety of technologically advanced films for use in the
food, pharmaceutical and industrial end-markets. Flexible packaging paper and metallicized paper
labels and heat transfer labels are used in a wide range of consumer applications.
Business segment information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
NET SALES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
907.2 |
|
|
$ |
867.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,732.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,702.4 |
|
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
173.5 |
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
349.1 |
|
|
|
338.2 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,080.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,036.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,081.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,040.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
90.8 |
|
|
$ |
75.0 |
|
|
$ |
165.2 |
|
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
|
(79.5 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
76.3 |
|
|
$ |
22.8 |
|
|
$ |
144.9 |
|
|
$ |
82.4 |
|
|
NOTE 11 EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
In millions, except per share data |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
(32.8 |
) |
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
|
Weighted Average Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
378.9 |
|
|
|
343.7 |
|
|
|
361.6 |
|
|
|
343.5 |
|
Dilutive Effect of Stock Awards |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
384.5 |
|
|
|
343.7 |
|
|
|
367.1 |
|
|
|
343.5 |
|
|
Earnings (Loss) Per Share Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
The following are the potentially dilutive securities excluded from the above calculation because
the effect would have been anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Employee Stock Options |
|
|
4,502,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,503,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,502,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,503,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
NOTE 12 GUARANTOR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect GPHC and GPC (collectively the Parent);
GPII (the Subsidiary Issuer); and the Subsidiary Guarantors, which consist of all material 100%
owned subsidiaries of GPII other than its foreign subsidiaries. The nonguarantor subsidiaries are
herein referred to as Nonguarantor Subsidiaries. Separate complete financial statements of the
Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented because the guarantors are jointly and severally, fully and
unconditionally liable under the guarantees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
Nonguarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
|
In millions |
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
877.0 |
|
|
$ |
135.5 |
|
|
$ |
133.2 |
|
|
$ |
(65.0 |
) |
|
$ |
1,080.7 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
736.8 |
|
|
|
122.8 |
|
|
|
120.7 |
|
|
|
(65.0 |
) |
|
|
915.3 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.4 |
|
Other (Income) Expense, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
Income from Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.6 |
) |
Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
Income before Income Taxes and Equity
Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
Income before Equity Income of
Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Equity in Net Earnings of Subsidiaries |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
(40.7 |
) |
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
Nonguarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
|
In millions |
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
841.5 |
|
|
$ |
130.8 |
|
|
$ |
111.8 |
|
|
$ |
(47.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,036.5 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
720.6 |
|
|
|
115.6 |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
|
(47.6 |
) |
|
|
887.7 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.4 |
|
Other Expense, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Restructuring and Other Special Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
Income from Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.0 |
) |
Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
(Loss) Income before Income Taxes and
Equity Income of Unconsolidated
Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33.9 |
) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
(Loss) Income before Equity Income of
Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42.0 |
) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Equity in Net Earnings of Subsidiaries |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(32.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(32.8 |
) |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
23.5 |
|
|
$ |
(32.8 |
) |
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
Nonguarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
|
In millions |
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,688.2 |
|
|
$ |
272.4 |
|
|
$ |
240.8 |
|
|
$ |
(120.1 |
) |
|
$ |
2,081.3 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,417.3 |
|
|
|
242.0 |
|
|
|
218.5 |
|
|
|
(120.1 |
) |
|
|
1,757.7 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
146.5 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179.9 |
|
Other (Income) Expense, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
Income from Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
126.0 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144.9 |
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75.9 |
) |
Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
Income before Income Taxes and Equity
Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.2 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
Income before Equity Income of
Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Equity in Net Earnings of Subsidiaries |
|
|
58.8 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
(77.6 |
) |
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
Nonguarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
|
In millions |
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,652.4 |
|
|
$ |
264.6 |
|
|
$ |
211.6 |
|
|
$ |
(88.0 |
) |
|
$ |
2,040.6 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,409.9 |
|
|
|
231.4 |
|
|
|
192.7 |
|
|
|
(88.0 |
) |
|
|
1,746.0 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.9 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155.8 |
|
Other Expense (Income), Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Restructuring and Other Special Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
Income from Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90.0 |
) |
Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
(Loss) Income before Income Taxes and
Equity Income of Unconsolidated
Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.2 |
) |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
(Loss) Income before Equity Income of
Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43.0 |
) |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Equity in Net Earnings of Subsidiaries |
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
Nonguarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
|
In millions |
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
191.2 |
|
Receivables, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
296.7 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
92.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441.7 |
|
Inventories, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
356.3 |
|
|
|
67.7 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490.9 |
|
Intercompany |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
(95.1 |
) |
|
|
(61.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
1,016.2 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,195.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,458.4 |
|
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
1,635.6 |
|
Investment in Consolidated
Subsidiaries |
|
|
1,034.9 |
|
|
|
253.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
143.0 |
|
|
|
(1,435.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,185.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,221.1 |
|
Intangible Assets, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
546.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558.1 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,049.9 |
|
|
$ |
4,493.9 |
|
|
$ |
143.4 |
|
|
$ |
405.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1,436.1 |
) |
|
$ |
4,657.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Debt and Current
Portion of Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19.7 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
289.1 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393.6 |
|
Interest Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
Other Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
162.7 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189.3 |
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
486.3 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,417.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,418.1 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
247.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250.5 |
|
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
307.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311.2 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,459.0 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,607.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,049.9 |
|
|
|
1,034.9 |
|
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
312.6 |
|
|
|
(1,436.1 |
) |
|
|
1,049.9 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
1,049.9 |
|
|
$ |
4,493.9 |
|
|
$ |
143.4 |
|
|
$ |
405.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1,436.1 |
) |
|
$ |
4,657.0 |
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
Nonguarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
|
In millions |
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
107.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
138.7 |
|
Receivables, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
266.1 |
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382.2 |
|
Inventories, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
315.8 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417.3 |
|
Intercompany |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
144.0 |
|
|
|
(103.3 |
) |
|
|
(49.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.4 |
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
902.4 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
103.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,013.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,460.0 |
|
|
|
119.5 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
1,641.5 |
|
Investment in Consolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
738.2 |
|
|
|
220.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
129.6 |
|
|
|
(1,089.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,170.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,205.2 |
|
Intangible Assets, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
564.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576.6 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
747.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,354.1 |
|
|
$ |
119.4 |
|
|
$ |
353.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1,089.6 |
) |
|
$ |
4,484.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Debt and Current Portion of
Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
281.6 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361.5 |
|
Interest Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
Other Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
157.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179.8 |
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
486.3 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
62.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
595.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,552.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,553.1 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
237.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241.1 |
|
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
340.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347.7 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,615.9 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,737.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
747.0 |
|
|
|
738.2 |
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
278.7 |
|
|
|
(1,089.6 |
) |
|
|
747.0 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
747.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,354.1 |
|
|
$ |
119.4 |
|
|
$ |
353.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1,089.6 |
) |
|
$ |
4,484.6 |
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
Nonguarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
|
In millions |
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
(77.6 |
) |
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
Non-cash Items Included in Net Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
125.2 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139.4 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Amount of Postretirement Expense Less
Than Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
Equity in Net Earnings of Subsidiaries |
|
|
(58.8 |
) |
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71.9 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94.0 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.2 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Spending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70.8 |
) |
Acquisition of Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51.9 |
) |
Other, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
238.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238.0 |
|
Repurchase of Common Stock |
|
|
(32.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.9 |
) |
Payments on Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150.0 |
) |
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
Payments on Revolving Credit Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55.8 |
) |
Other, Net |
|
|
(205.1 |
) |
|
|
205.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.5 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
191.2 |
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
Nonguarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
|
In millions |
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
(26.5 |
) |
Non-cash Items Included in Net (Loss) Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
134.7 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147.6 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Amount of Postretirement Expense Less
Than Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
Equity in Net Earnings of Subsidiaries |
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42.9 |
) |
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.2 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Spending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
Other, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.9 |
) |
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.4 |
|
Payments on Revolving Credit Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110.4 |
) |
Redemption and Early Tender Premiums and Debt
Issuance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing
Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
142.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
171.6 |
|
|
22
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
This managements discussion and analysis of financial conditions and results of operations is
intended to provide investors with an understanding of Graphic Packaging Holding Companys (GPHC
and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company) past performance, its financial condition and
its prospects. The following will be discussed and analyzed:
Ø |
|
Overview of Business |
|
Ø |
|
Overview of 2011 Results |
|
Ø |
|
Results of Operations |
|
Ø |
|
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources |
|
Ø |
|
Critical Accounting Policies |
|
Ø |
|
New Accounting Standards |
|
Ø |
|
Business Outlook |
OVERVIEW OF BUSINESS
The Companys objective is to strengthen its position as a leading provider of packaging solutions.
To achieve this objective, the Company offers customers its paperboard, cartons and packaging
machines, either as an integrated solution or separately. Cartons and carriers are designed to
protect and contain products. Product offerings include a variety of laminated, coated and printed
packaging structures that are produced from the Companys CUK, CRB, and URB, as well as other
grades of paperboard that are purchased from third party suppliers. Innovative designs and
combinations of paperboard, films, foils, metallization, holographics and embossing are customized
to the individual needs of the customers.
The Company is a leading supplier of flexible packaging in North America. Products include
multi-wall bags, shingle wrap, plastic bags and film for building materials (such as ready-mix
concrete), retort pouches (such as meals ready to go), medical test kits, batch inclusion bags and
film. Key end-markets include food and agriculture, building and industrial materials, chemicals,
minerals, pet foods, and pharmaceutical products. The Companys label business focuses on two
product lines: heat transfer labels and lithographic labels.
The Company is implementing strategies (i) to expand market share in its current markets and to
identify and penetrate new markets; (ii) to capitalize on the Companys customer relationships,
business competencies, and mills and converting assets; (iii) to develop and market innovative,
sustainable products and applications; and (iv) to continue to reduce costs by focusing on
operational improvements. The Companys ability to fully implement its strategies and achieve its
objective may be influenced by a variety of factors, many of which are beyond its control, such as
inflation of raw material and other costs, which the Company cannot always pass through to its
customers, and the effect of overcapacity in the worldwide paperboard packaging industry.
Significant Factors That Impact The Companys Business
Impact of Inflation. The Companys cost of sales consists primarily of energy (including natural
gas, fuel oil and electricity), pine pulpwood, chemicals, recycled fibers, purchased paperboard,
paper, aluminum foil, ink, plastic films and resins, depreciation expense and labor. Inflation
increased costs in the first six months of 2011 by $79.2 million, compared to the first six months of
2010. The higher costs in 2011 are primarily related to chemical-based inputs ($23.2 million);
externally purchased board ($17.2 million); labor and related benefits ($14.3 million); secondary
fiber ($12.5 million); externally purchased paper ($10.8 million); and freight ($9.8 million). These higher
costs were partially offset by lower wood ($5.1 million); other inflation ($1.8 million); and
energy costs ($1.7 million), mainly due to the price of natural gas.
23
The Company expects commodity inflation to continue due to
global demand as new paperboard capacity is being built in emerging markets. The
capacity is primarily in the CRB substrate, putting further inflationary pressure on secondary fiber and mill chemicals.
The Company has entered into contracts
designed to manage risks associated with future variability in cash flows caused by changes in the
price of natural gas. The Company has entered into natural gas swap contracts to hedge prices for a
portion of its expected natural gas usage for the remainder of 2011 and the first quarter of 2012.
Since negotiated sales contracts and the market largely determine the pricing for its products, the
Company is at times limited in its ability to raise prices and pass through to its customers any
inflationary or other cost increases that the Company may incur.
Substantial Debt Obligations. The Company had $2,437.8 million of outstanding debt obligations as
of June 30, 2011. This debt can have significant consequences for the Company, as it requires a
significant portion of cash flow from operations to be used for the payment of principal and
interest, exposes the Company to the risk of increased interest rates and restricts the Companys
ability to obtain additional financing. Covenants in the Companys Credit Agreement dated May 16,
2007, as amended (the Credit Agreement) and the indentures governing its 9.5% Senior Notes due
2017, the 9.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013, and the 7.875% Senior Notes due 2018 (the
Indentures) also prohibit or restrict, among other things, the disposal of assets, the incurrence
of additional indebtedness (including guarantees), payment of dividends, loans or advances and
certain other types of transactions. These restrictions could limit the Companys flexibility to
respond to changing market conditions and competitive pressures. The Credit Agreement also requires
compliance with a maximum consolidated secured leverage ratio. The Companys ability to comply in
future periods with the financial covenant will depend on its ongoing financial and operating
performance, which in turn will be subject to many other factors, many of which are beyond the
Companys control. See Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources Liquidity and
Capital Resources for additional information regarding the Companys debt obligations.
The substantial debt and the restrictions under the Credit Agreement and the Indentures could limit
the Companys flexibility to respond to changing market conditions and competitive pressures. The
material outstanding debt obligations and the restrictions may also leave the Company more
vulnerable to a downturn in general economic conditions or its business, or unable to carry out
capital expenditures that are necessary or important to its growth strategy and productivity
improvement programs.
Commitment to Cost Reduction. In light of increasing margin pressure throughout the packaging
industry, the Company has programs in place that are designed to reduce costs, improve productivity
and increase profitability. The Company utilizes a global continuous improvement initiative that
uses statistical process control to help design and manage many types of activities, including
production and maintenance. This includes a Six Sigma process focused on reducing variable and
fixed manufacturing and administrative costs. The Company expanded the continuous improvement
initiative to include the deployment of Lean Sigma principles into manufacturing and supply chain
services. As the Company strengthens the systems approach to continuous improvement, Lean Sigma
supports the efforts to build a high performing culture. During the first six months of 2011, the
Company achieved $48.7 million in cost savings as compared to the first six months of 2010, through
its continuous improvement programs and manufacturing initiatives.
The Companys ability to continue to successfully implement its business strategies and to realize
anticipated savings and operating efficiencies is subject to significant business, economic and
competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Companys control. If the
Company cannot successfully implement the strategic cost reductions or other cost savings plans it
may not be able to continue to compete successfully against other manufacturers. In addition, any
failure to generate the anticipated efficiencies and savings could adversely affect the Companys
financial results.
Competition and Market Factors. As some products can be packaged in different types of materials,
the Companys sales are affected by competition from other manufacturers CUK board and other
substrates such as solid bleached sulfate and recycled clay-coated news. Substitute products also
include plastic, shrink film and corrugated containers. In addition, while the Company has
long-term relationships with many of its customers, the underlying contracts may be re-bid or
renegotiated from time to time, and the Company may not be successful in renewing on favorable
terms or at all. The Company works to maintain market share through efficiency, product innovation
and strategic sourcing to its customers; however, pricing and other competitive pressures may
occasionally result in the loss of a customer relationship.
In addition, the Companys sales historically are driven by consumer buying habits in the markets
its customers serve. Increases in the costs of living, the poor condition of the residential real
estate market, high unemployment rates, reduced access to credit markets, as well as other
macroeconomic factors, may significantly negatively affect consumer spending behavior, which could
have a material adverse effect on demand for the Companys products. New product introductions and
promotional activity by the Companys customers and the Companys introduction of new packaging
products also impact its sales. The Companys containerboard business is subject to conditions in
the cyclical worldwide commodity paperboard markets, which have a significant impact on
containerboard sales.
24
OVERVIEW OF 2011 RESULTS
This managements discussion and analysis contains an analysis of Net Sales, Income from Operations
and other information relevant to an understanding of results of operations.
|
|
|
During the second quarter 2011, the Company completed a
public offering of 52.5 million shares its common stock par value $0.01 per share, priced at $4.75 per share and received net proceeds of $238.0 million after offering expenses. The Company
used $32.9 million of the net proceeds to repurchase and subsequently retire approximately
7.3 million shares of common stock held by the Grover C. Coors Trust. The Company also used
a portion of the net proceeds to prepay $150.0 million of its term loans. Additionally, the
Company used $51.9 million to acquire substantially all of the assets of Sierra Pacific
Packaging, Inc. (Sierra), a producer of folding cartons, beverage carriers and corrugated boxes for
the consumer packaged goods industry. |
|
|
|
|
Net Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased by $44.2 million, or 4.3%,
to $1,080.7 million from $1,036.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010
primarily due to higher pricing for all segments and favorable currency exchange rates
primarily in Europe, Japan and Australia. These increases were partially offset by lower
volume due to market softness. |
|
|
|
|
Income from Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased by $53.5
million to $76.3 million from $22.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This
increase was primarily due to lower restructuring charges of $46.6 million, the higher
pricing, and improved performance due to cost savings, partially offset by higher inflation
and the lower volume. |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Segment Information
The Company reports its results in two business segments: paperboard packaging and flexible packaging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
NET SALES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
907.2 |
|
|
$ |
867.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,732.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,702.4 |
|
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
173.5 |
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
349.1 |
|
|
|
338.2 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,080.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,036.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,081.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,040.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
90.8 |
|
|
$ |
75.0 |
|
|
$ |
165.2 |
|
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
|
(79.5 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
76.3 |
|
|
$ |
22.8 |
|
|
$ |
144.9 |
|
|
$ |
82.4 |
|
|
25
SECOND QUARTER 2011 COMPARED WITH SECOND QUARTER 2010
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Percent |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Change |
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
907.2 |
|
|
$ |
867.8 |
|
|
$ |
39.4 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
173.5 |
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,080.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,036.5 |
|
|
$ |
44.2 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
The components of the change in Net Sales by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variances |
|
|
In millions |
|
2010 |
|
Price |
|
Volume/Mix |
|
Exchange |
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
867.8 |
|
|
$ |
27.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
$ |
39.4 |
|
|
$ |
907.2 |
|
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
173.5 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,036.5 |
|
|
$ |
35.8 |
|
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
$ |
44.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,080.7 |
|
|
Paperboard Packaging
The Companys Net Sales from paperboard packaging for the three months ended June 30, 2011
increased by $39.4 million, or 4.5%, to $907.2 million from $867.8 million for the same period in
2010 as a result of higher pricing for consumer and beverage products primarily due to inflationary
cost pass throughs and for open market CUK, CRB and containerboard. Favorable foreign
exchange rates primarily in Europe, Japan and Australia also positively impacted Net Sales. These
increases were partially offset by lower volume for consumer products, soft drink, containerboard
and open market CRB and CUK sales. The lower consumer products sales was due to the continuing
impact of general market conditions in which volume was down primarily in cereal, dry foods and
frozen foods. The decrease in soft drink sales volume was due to higher consumer pricing and prior
year promotional activity. Beer volumes were up slightly due to the smaller craft beer market.
Flexible Packaging
The Companys Net Sales from flexible packaging for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased
by $4.8 million to $173.5 million from $168.7 million as a result of higher pricing primarily due
to negotiated inflationary pass throughs. The pricing increase was partially offset by lower volume
as a result of the market conditions where construction and industrial sectors remained weak.
Income (Loss) from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Percent |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Change |
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
90.8 |
|
|
$ |
75.0 |
|
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
% |
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(86.7 |
%) |
Corporate |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
(a) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
76.3 |
|
|
$ |
22.8 |
|
|
$ |
53.5 |
|
|
|
234.6 |
% |
|
(a) |
|
Percentage is not meaningful. |
26
The components of the change in Income (Loss) from Operations by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variances |
|
|
In millions |
|
2010 |
|
Price |
|
Volume/Mix |
|
Inflation |
|
Exchange |
|
Other(a) |
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
75.0 |
|
|
$ |
27.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(33.0 |
) |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.2 |
|
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
$ |
90.8 |
|
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
22.8 |
|
|
$ |
35.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(43.7 |
) |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
56.4 |
|
|
$ |
53.5 |
|
|
$ |
76.3 |
|
|
Note:
(a) |
|
Includes the Companys cost reduction initiatives and expenses
related to the Altivity Transaction. |
Paperboard Packaging
The Companys Income from Operations from paperboard packaging for the three months ended June 30,
2011 increased by $15.8 million, or 21.1%, to $90.8 million from $75.0 million for the same period
in 2010 as a result of the higher pricing, cost savings through continuous improvement programs and
favorable currency rates. These increases were partially offset by inflation, which was primarily
related to higher chemical-based inputs ($9.8 million); externally purchased board ($8.4 million);
labor and related benefits ($8.1 million); secondary fiber ($7.5 million); freight ($4.4 million);
and energy costs ($0.9 million), mainly due to the price of electricity. These higher costs were
partially offset by lower wood ($1.9 million) and other costs ($4.2 million). During the second
quarter 2011, the Company took down time in its converting facilities to manage inventory due to
market softness, resulting in $5.9 million of higher costs due to lower absorption. Additionally,
the Company recorded $2.3 million for severance expense and accelerated depreciation for assets
that will be removed from service before the end of their useful lives due to planned closure of
the Cincinnati, OH facility.
Flexible Packaging
The Companys Income from Operations from flexible packaging for the three months ended June 30,
2011 decreased by $3.9 million, or 86.7%, to $0.6 million from $4.5 million for the same period in
2010 as a result of inflation. The inflation was primarily due to externally purchased paper ($5.0
million); resin ($2.1 million); labor and related benefits ($1.3 million); film ($1.3 million); and
other costs ($1.0 million). Additionally, the Company recorded $1.6 million for severance expense
and accelerated depreciation for assets that will be removed from service before the end of their
useful lives due to the closure of the Jacksonville, AR facility. The higher costs were partially
offset by the higher pricing and cost savings.
Corporate
The Companys Loss from Operations from corporate for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was
$15.1 million compared to $56.7 million for the same period in 2010. The change was primarily due
to lower restructuring expenses of $46.6 million due to the finalization of merger-related
activities last year and partially offset by higher stock compensation expense.
27
FIRST SIX MONTHS 2011 COMPARED WITH FIRST SIX MONTHS 2010
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Percent |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Change |
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
1,732.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,702.4 |
|
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
349.1 |
|
|
|
338.2 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,081.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,040.6 |
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
The components of the change in Net Sales by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variances |
|
|
In millions |
|
2010 |
|
Price |
|
Volume/Mix |
|
Exchange |
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
1,702.4 |
|
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
$ |
(29.4 |
) |
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,732.2 |
|
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
338.2 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
349.1 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,040.6 |
|
|
$ |
59.8 |
|
|
$ |
(36.2 |
) |
|
$ |
17.1 |
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,081.3 |
|
|
Paperboard Packaging
The Companys Net Sales from paperboard packaging for the first six months of 2011 increased by
$29.8 million, or 1.8%, to $1,732.2 million from $1,702.4 million for the same period in 2010 as a
result of higher pricing for consumer and beverage products, open market CUK and CRB, and
containerboard. Favorable currency exchange rate
changes, primarily in Europe, Japan and Australia, also positively impacted Net Sales. These
increases were partially offset by lower volume for consumer products, soft drink, containerboard
and open market CRB and CUK sales. The lower consumer products volume were due to the continuing
impact of general market conditions in which volume was down primarily in cereal, dry foods and
frozen foods. The decrease in soft drink volume was due to higher consumer pricing and prior year
promotional activity. Beer volumes were up slightly driven by increases in the smaller craft beer
market.
Flexible Packaging
The Companys Net Sales from flexible packaging for the first six months of 2011 increased by $10.9
million, or 3.2%, to $349.1 million from $338.2 million for the same period in 2010 as a result of
the higher pricing and favorable currency exchange rates in Canada, partially offset by the impact
of lower volume/mix due to market softness in the building products, construction and industrial
sectors.
Income (Loss) from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Percent |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Change |
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
165.2 |
|
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
Flexible Packaging |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(41.1 |
%) |
Corporate |
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
|
(79.5 |
) |
|
|
52.6 |
|
|
|
N.M |
(a) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
144.9 |
|
|
$ |
82.4 |
|
|
$ |
62.5 |
|
|
|
75.8 |
% |
|
(a) |
|
Percentage is not meaningful. |
28
The components of the change in Income (Loss) from Operations by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variances |
|
|
In millions |
|
2010 |
|
Price |
|
Volume/Mix |
|
Inflation |
|
Exchange |
|
Other(a) |
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
Paperboard Packaging |
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
$ |
(5.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(57.1 |
) |
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
165.2 |
|
Specialty Packaging |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(79.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
|
52.6 |
|
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
82.4 |
|
|
$ |
59.8 |
|
|
$ |
(7.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(79.2 |
) |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
|
$ |
78.7 |
|
|
$ |
62.5 |
|
|
$ |
144.9 |
|
|
Note:
(a) |
|
Includes the Companys cost reduction initiatives and expenses related to the Altivity
Transaction. |
Paperboard Packaging
The Companys Income from Operations from paperboard packaging for the first six months of 2011
increased by $14.5 million, or 9.6%, to $165.2 million from $150.7 million for the same period in
2010 as a result of the higher pricing, cost savings through continuous improvement programs
primarily focused on maximizing productivity and minimizing waste in the production cycle and
favorable currency exchange rates. These increases were partially offset by higher costs due to
inflation, the lower volume in consumer and beverage products as well as higher stock
compensation costs. The inflation was primarily related to higher chemical-based input ($17.7
million); externally purchased board ($17.2 million); secondary fiber ($12.5 million); labor and
benefits ($11.8 million); and freight ($8.6 million). These higher costs were partially offset by
lower wood ($5.1 million); energy costs ($1.8 million), mainly due to the price of natural gas; and
other costs ($3.8 million). The first six months of 2011 were also negatively impacted by the
storms in the Midwestern United States in February which interrupted shipments and resulted in lost
sales for consumer products as well as the previously mentioned downtime taken in the converting
facilities to manage inventory. Additionally, the Company recorded $2.3 million for severance
expense and accelerated depreciation for assets that will be removed from service before the end of
their useful lives due to the planned closure of the Cincinnati, OH facility.
Flexible Packaging
The Companys Income from Operations from flexible packaging for the first six months of 2011
decreased by $4.6 million, or 41.1%, to $6.6 million from $11.2 million for the same period in 2010
as a result of inflation, soft volume and higher stock compensation costs. The inflation was
related to externally purchased paper ($10.8 million); resin ($5.0 million); labor and benefits ($2.5 million);
film ($1.9 million); freight ($1.1 million); and other inflation ($0.8 million). Additionally, the
Company recorded $2.6 million for severance expense and accelerated depreciation for assets that
will be removed from service before the end of their useful lives due to the closure of the
Jacksonville, AR facility. The higher costs were partially offset by the higher pricing and cost
savings through continuous improvement.
Corporate
The Companys Loss from Operations from corporate for the first six months of 2011 was $26.9
million compared to $79.5 million for the same period in 2010. The change was primarily due to
$55.1 million higher merger-related expense in 2010 primarily for the charges related to finalizing
restructuring activities and favorable currency exchange impact, partially offset by higher stock
compensation expense.
INTEREST EXPENSE, NET AND INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Interest Expense, Net
Interest Expense, Net was $75.9 million and $90.0 million for the first six months of 2011 and
2010, respectively. Interest Expense, Net decreased due to lower debt levels and lower average
rates of the Companys debt. As of June 30, 2011, approximately 32% of the Companys total debt was
subject to floating interest rates.
29
Income Tax Expense
During the first six months of 2011, the Company recognized Income Tax Expense of $10.3 million on
Income before Income Taxes and Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities of $68.2 million. During
the first six months of 2010, the Company recognized Income Tax Expense of $18.8 million on Loss
before Income Taxes and Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities of $8.5 million. Income Tax
Expense for the first six months of 2011 and 2010 primarily relates to the noncash expense of $11.2
million and $15.9 million, respectively, associated with the amortization of goodwill for tax
purposes. The Company has approximately $1.2 billion of net operating loss carryforwards for U.S.
federal income tax purposes, which is currently being used and may be used to offset future taxable income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company broadly defines liquidity as its ability to generate sufficient funds from both
internal and external sources to meet its obligations and commitments. In addition, liquidity
includes the ability to obtain appropriate debt and equity financing and to convert into cash those
assets that are no longer required to meet existing strategic and financial objectives. Therefore,
liquidity cannot be considered separately from capital resources that consist of current or
potentially available funds for use in achieving long-range business objectives and meeting debt
service commitments.
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
In millions |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
$ |
117.6 |
|
|
$ |
95.6 |
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(124.5 |
) |
|
|
(37.1 |
) |
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities for the first six months of 2011 totaled $117.6 million,
compared to $95.6 million for the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to higher net
income, which was partially offset by higher working capital requirements due primarily to higher
inventory levels as a result of lower sales volume.
Net cash used in investing activities for the first six months of 2011 totaled $124.5 million,
compared to $37.1 million for the same period in 2010. This year over year change was due primarily
to the acquisition of Sierra of $51.9 million; and an increase in capital
spending of $31.1 million as a result of managements decision to invest in capital projects to
improve process capabilities and reduce costs including the previously announced biomass boiler
project in Macon, GA.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the first six months of 2011 totaled $57.5 million
compared to net cash used in financing activities of $35.4 million for the same period in 2010.
This change was primarily due to the net proceeds from the equity offering of $238.0 million which
was used to make payments of $150.0 million on the Companys term loans and to repurchase its
common stock for $32.9 million. In June 2010, the Company redeemed $34.9 million of its Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013.
In July 2011, the Company called the remaining $73.3 million of its Senior Subordinated Notes due
2013 for settlement on August 15, 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys liquidity needs arise primarily from debt service on its substantial indebtedness and
from the funding of its capital expenditures, ongoing operating costs and working capital.
Principal and interest payments under the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility,
together with principal and interest payments on the Companys 9.5% Senior Notes due 2017, the 9.5%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013, and the 7.875% Senior Notes due 2018 (Notes), represent
significant liquidity requirements for the Company. Based upon current levels of operations,
anticipated cost savings and expectations as to future growth, the Company believes that cash
generated from operations, together with amounts available under its revolving credit facility and
other available financing sources, will be adequate to permit the Company to meet its debt service
obligations, necessary capital expenditure program requirements and ongoing operating costs and
working capital needs, although no assurance can be given in this regard. The
Companys future financial and operating performance, ability to service or refinance its debt and
ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in its debt agreements (see
Covenant Restrictions) will be subject to future economic conditions,
30
including conditions in the credit markets, and to financial, business and other factors, many of
which are beyond the Companys control, and will be substantially dependent on the selling prices
and demand for the Companys products, raw material and energy costs, and the Companys ability to
successfully implement its overall business and profitability strategies.
Covenant Restrictions
The Credit Agreement and the Indentures limit the Companys ability to incur additional
indebtedness. Additional covenants contained in the Credit Agreement and the Indentures, among
other things, restrict the ability of the Company to dispose of assets, incur guarantee
obligations, prepay other indebtedness, make dividends and other restricted payments, create liens,
make equity or debt investments, make acquisitions, modify terms of the indentures under which the
Notes are issued, engage in mergers or consolidations, change the business conducted by the Company
and its subsidiaries, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates. Such restrictions,
together with the highly leveraged nature of the Company and disruptions in the credit markets,
could limit the Companys ability to respond to changing market conditions, fund its capital
spending program, provide for unexpected capital investments or take advantage of business
opportunities.
Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company must comply with a maximum consolidated
secured leverage ratio, which is defined as the ratio of: (a) total long-term and short-term
indebtedness of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries as determined in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP), plus the aggregate
cash proceeds received by the Company and its subsidiaries from any receivables or other
securitization, but excluding therefrom (i) all unsecured indebtedness, (ii) all subordinated
indebtedness permitted to be incurred under the Credit Agreement, and (iii) all secured
indebtedness of foreign subsidiaries to (b) Adjusted EBITDA, which we refer to as Credit Agreement
EBITDA(1). Pursuant to this financial covenant, the Company must maintain a maximum consolidated
secured leverage ratio of less than the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Consolidated Secured |
|
|
Leverage Ratio(1) |
|
October 1, 2009 and thereafter |
|
|
4.75 to 1.00 |
|
|
Note:
(1) |
|
Credit Agreement EBITDA is defined in the Credit Agreement as consolidated net income before
consolidated net interest expense, non-cash expenses and charges, total income tax expense,
depreciation expense, expense associated with amortization of intangibles and other assets,
non-cash provisions for reserves for discontinued operations, extraordinary, unusual or
non-recurring gains or losses or charges or credits, gain or loss associated with sale or
write-down of assets not in the ordinary course of business, any income or loss accounted for
by the equity method of accounting, and projected run rate cost savings, prior to or within a
twelve month period. |
At June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenant in the Credit Agreement
and the ratio was as follows:
Consolidated
Secured Leverage Ratio 2.49 to 1.00
The Companys management believes that presentation of the consolidated secured leverage ratio and
Credit Agreement EBITDA herein provides useful information to investors because borrowings under
the Credit Agreement are a key source of the Companys liquidity, and the Companys ability to
borrow under the Credit Agreement is dependent on, among other things, its compliance with the
financial ratio covenant. Any failure by the Company to comply with this financial covenant could
result in an event of default, absent a waiver or amendment from the lenders under such agreement,
in which case the lenders may be entitled to declare all amounts owed to be due and payable
immediately.
Credit Agreement EBITDA is a financial measure not calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and is
not a measure of net income, operating income, operating performance or liquidity presented in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. Credit Agreement EBITDA should be considered in addition to results
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, but should not be considered a substitute for, or superior
to, U.S. GAAP results. In addition, Credit Agreement EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA or
similarly titled measures utilized by other companies because other companies may not calculate
Credit Agreement EBITDA in the same manner as the Company does.
31
The calculations of the components of the maximum consolidated secured leverage ratio for and as of
the period ended June 30, 2011 are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended |
In millions |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
96.0 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
19.0 |
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
160.4 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
280.5 |
|
Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities, Net of Dividends |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Other Non-Cash Charges |
|
|
39.9 |
|
Losses Associated with Sale/Write-Down of Assets |
|
|
2.2 |
|
Other Non-Recurring/Extraordinary/Unusual Items |
|
|
15.2 |
|
Projected
Run Rate Cost Savings (a) |
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
Credit Agreement EBITDA |
|
$ |
674.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
In millions |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Short-Term Debt |
|
$ |
19.7 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
2,418.1 |
|
|
Total Debt |
|
$ |
2,437.8 |
|
Less Adjustments (b) |
|
|
760.1 |
|
|
Consolidated Secured Indebtedness |
|
$ |
1,677.7 |
|
|
Notes:
(a) |
|
As defined by the Credit Agreement, this represents projected cost savings expected by the
Company to be realized as a result of specific actions taken or expected to be taken prior to
or within twelve months of the period in which Credit Agreement EBITDA is to be calculated,
net of the amount of actual benefits realized or expected to be realized from such actions. |
|
|
|
The terms of the Credit Agreement limit the amount of projected run rate cost savings that may be
used in calculating Credit Agreement EBITDA by stipulating that such amount may not exceed the
lesser of (i) ten percent of EBITDA as defined in the Credit Agreement for the last twelve-month
period (before giving effect to projected run rate cost savings) and (ii) $100 million. As a
result, in calculating Credit Agreement EBITDA above, the Company used projected run rate cost
savings of $61.3 million or ten percent of EBITDA as calculated in accordance with the Credit
Agreement, which amount is lower than total projected cost savings identified by the Company, net
of actual benefits realized for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2011. Projected run rate
cost savings were calculated by the Company solely for its use in calculating Credit Agreement
EBITDA for purposes of determining compliance with the maximum consolidated secured leverage
ratio contained in the Credit Agreement and should not be used for any other purpose. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents consolidated indebtedness/securitization that is either (i) unsecured, or (ii) all
subordinated indebtedness permitted to be incurred under the Credit Agreement, or secured
indebtedness permitted to be incurred by the Companys foreign subsidiaries per the Credit
Agreement. |
The
Companys credit rating was upgraded to BB by Standard & Poors and
Ba3 by Moodys Investor Services during the second quarter. As of June 30, 2011, Standard & Poors
ratings on the Company have a positive outlook, while Moodys Investor Services ratings on the
Company have a stable outlook.
If inflationary pressures on key inputs continue, or depressed selling prices, lower sales volumes,
increased operating costs or other factors have a negative impact on the Companys ability to
increase its profitability, the Company may not be able to maintain its compliance with the
financial covenant in its Credit Agreement. The Companys ability to comply in future periods with
the financial covenant in the Credit Agreement will depend on its ongoing financial and operating
performance, which in turn will be subject to economic conditions and to financial, business and
other factors, many of which are beyond the Companys control, and will be substantially dependent
on the selling prices for the Companys products, raw material and energy costs, and the Companys
ability to
32
successfully implement its overall business strategies, and meet its profitability objective. If a
violation of the financial covenant or any of the other covenants occurred, the Company would
attempt to obtain a waiver or an amendment from its lenders, although no assurance can be given
that the Company would be successful in this regard. The Credit Agreement and the Indentures
governing the Notes have certain cross-default or cross-acceleration provisions; failure to comply
with these covenants in any agreement could result in a violation of such agreement which could, in
turn, lead to violations of other agreements pursuant to such cross-default or cross-acceleration
provisions. If an event of default occurs, the lenders are entitled to declare all amounts owed to
be due and payable immediately. The Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of the
Companys domestic assets.
Capital Investment
The Companys capital investment in the first six months of 2011 was $70.8 million compared to
$39.7 million in the first six months of 2010. During the first six months of 2011, the Company had
capital spending of $53.0 million for improving process capabilities, $8.3 million for capital
spares and $9.5 million for manufacturing packaging machinery.
Environmental Matters
Some of the Companys current and former facilities are the subject of environmental investigations
and remediations resulting from historical operations and the release of hazardous substances or
other constituents. Some current and former facilities have a history of industrial usage for which
investigation and remediation obligations may be imposed in the future or for which indemnification
claims may be asserted against the Company. Also, potential future closures or sales of facilities
may necessitate further investigation and may result in future remediation at those facilities. The
Company has established reserves for those facilities or issues where liability is probable and the
costs are reasonably estimable.
For further discussion of the Companys environmental matters, see Note 9 in Part I, Item 1, Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from these estimates, and changes in these estimates are
recorded when known. The critical accounting policies used by management in the preparation of the
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements are those that are important both to the
presentation of the Companys financial condition and results of operations and require significant
judgments by management with regard to estimates used.
The Companys most critical accounting policies which require significant judgment or involve
complex estimations are described in GPHCs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements impacting the Company, see Note 1 in Part I,
Item 1, Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
33
BUSINESS OUTLOOK
The Company expects to realize between $70 million and $90 million of year over year operating cost
savings from its continuous improvement programs, including Lean Sigma manufacturing projects.
Total
capital investment for 2011 is expected to be in the
$170 million range and is expected to relate principally to the
Companys process capability improvements (approximately $136
million), acquiring capital spares (approximately $20 million), and producing packaging machinery
(approximately $14 million).
The Company also expects the following in 2011:
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization in the $285 million range. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense of $145 million to $155 million, including $9 million of non-cash
interest expense associated with amortization of debt issuance costs. |
|
|
|
|
Net debt reduction from operations in the $200 million to $220 million range in addition
to the use of the proceeds from the equity offering. |
|
|
|
|
Pension plan contributions
of $50 million to $70 million. |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
For a discussion of certain market risks related to the Company, see Part II, Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk, in GPHCs Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no significant developments with respect to
derivatives or exposure to market risk during the first six months of 2011. For a discussion of
the Companys Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Hedging Activities, see GPHCs Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital
Resources.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management has carried out an evaluation, with the participation of its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Based upon such evaluation, management has concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
34
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is a party to a number of lawsuits arising in the ordinary conduct of its business.
Although the timing and outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company
does not believe that disposition of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. For more
information see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Environmental Matters.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in GPHCs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The
following table presents information with respect to purchases of
common stock by the Company during the three months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Shares That May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Period |
|
Purchased1 |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Plans or Programs1 |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
|
April 1, 2011 through April
30, 2011 |
|
|
6,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.54 |
|
|
|
6,500,000 |
|
|
|
975,000 |
|
May 1, 2011 through May 31, 2011 |
|
|
764,922 |
|
|
$ |
4.54 |
|
|
|
764,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,264,922 |
|
|
$ |
4.54 |
|
|
|
7,264,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
All shares were purchased from the Grover C. Coors Trust with a portion of the proceeds from the equity offering as described in Note 1 of Part I,
Item 1, Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification required by Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification required by Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING COMPANY
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ STEPHEN A. HELLRUNG
Stephen A. Hellrung
|
|
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
|
|
July 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DANIEL J. BLOUNT
Daniel J. Blount
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
July 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DEBORAH R. FRANK
Deborah R. Frank
|
|
Vice President and Chief
Accounting Officer
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
July 28, 2011 |
36